Vin Dicarlo brags of his many “conquests,” encouraging the majority of “average men” to foster and abuse so-called “harems” of three to seven women. This type of flagrant misogyny is what I stand-up against, what I have a problem with, and why I’m reluctant to use the terms PUA and “pickup” in-general.
I’d never call myself a PUA (or MPUA) for many reasons, but if for only one—no matter, for one factor alone is reason enough. To do so (to claim “PUA status”) would be to categorically associate myself with those whom a disrespect, despise and challenge.
When I approached (online) an artist, to commission a few illustrations, her response to me (initially) was that she “hoped to never, ever meet [me].” Yet after I explained my reasons for targeting the “standard game” consumer, her opinion shifted and she admitted to hastily casting judgment; I target “PUAs” not to enhance them, but to change them and show them another way, insofar as that can be effectively-achieved by such a small, virtually “unpublished” campaign.
I’m sure it doesn’t help that I maintain sexual-relationships with fourteen (as of March 7, 08) women. Polyamory… what can I say? Some people like feet, S&M or animals. It’s actually out of extreme responsibility that I don’t have a “girlfriend,” for it’s clear to me and those-close to me that I couldn’t fairly and respectfully maintain that-sort of relationship.
Neil Strauss writes of his many, many past-partners… describing their relations as if those women were mere-orifices for his penis’ repeated proddings. I wouldn’t be surprised to again find users on seduction forums calling women “cum catchers,” my want for disassociation and disapproval begins at their lack of creativity and follows-onto the obvious.
These people don’t appreciate, love, care for or respect women… at least not “equally.”
Half of “standard game” coaches wannabe-PUAs to “trick” women. Neil Strauss wholly supports outright-untruths; he says “it’s not lying, it’s flirting.” Say that aloud in a room full of women, not a self-proclaimed feminist amongst them—count how many of them call “bullshit.”
The theory is that “dishonesty” is attractive, but women just don’t want to admit it. Their collective-claim is that women want to be lied to, but will never admit it. Yes, I’m sure that it’s ever woman’s fantasy to get tricked into sleeping with some average-slob because he’s lied and said he was like “James Bond.” Yes, it might work… they offer a ticket to potentially getting laid, but it’s a Godless, loveless practice often resulting in disaster.
Just read Neil Strauss’ book The Game: “Style” claims to be “friends” with Mystery, and still describes him as a manic, depressed-bipolar, suicidal, abusive, destructive, childish, lonely, damaged and broken petty-womanizer.
How’s that for a selling-point for the seduction community—join a group of losers who’ll publicly badmouth you with… gasp! The truth!
I suppose if a person has more than one of the aforementioned conditions than outright-dishonesty and lies would seem more appealing than honesty. Especially with an army of followers citing “brilliant-successes” with said sleazy tactics.
I’m not claiming that “their techniques” don’t work. By all accounts, these weak, petty and pathetic men trick women into bed en masse. I’m saying that it’s misogynistic and wrong… and many women agree.
Recent Comments